ENTRIES
Welcome to Eric Cheng's online journal! You are not logged in. [ Log in ]
«  :: index ::  »

ReadyNAS Pro iSCSI benchmarks on Mac OS X

:: Wednesday, September 8th, 2010 @ 8:19:59 pm

:: Tags:

I’ve been using ReadyNAS products since they were still being sold by Infrant, but it wasn’t until the latest iteration that they became incredible performers. The Netgear ReadyNAS Pro has 6 SATA drive bays and funcations as just about every kind of server one could want (for a home office, that is).

My first ReadyNAS Pro has 7.89 TB accessible (1 disk redundancy), and is being used as a backup volume for 4 separate machines. SuperDuper! clones volumes to disk images hosted on the NAS, and it also serves as a Crashplan repository (through a Mac Mini running Mac OS X Server). The NAS also hosts all of my media (e.g. videos, music, installer disk images), serving media through shared volumes and various media servers (like UPnP to a Playstation 3).

I decided in July that I wanted to move my still images off of my Mac Pro onto network storage, but early tests using iSCSI showed inconsistent performance. Using a heavily-accessed ReadyNAS Pro to host an iSCSI volume seemed to be too much for the poor box.

After some deliberation, I decided to purchase a second ReadyNAS Pro to host a dedicated iSCSI volume for my Mac Pro. When it arrived, I put 5 x 2TB drives (old Seagate Barracuda LPs) and 1 x 1TB drive into it and did a factory reset. It initially allocated 927 GB per drive, but did a volume expansion afterwards. After more than 24 hours, it came online with 8.81 TB accessible (2 drive redundancy). I immediately ran benchmarks on it.

Network configuration: my Mac Pro is connected to the ReadyNAS Pro via a gigabit ethernet cable (through its second gigE port) bypassing switches and routers. I manually assigned ip addresses and turned jumbo frame support on (MTU 9000). All traffic between the Mac Pro and ReadyNAS Pro is isolated from other LAN traffic and internet traffic. I’m using ATTO Xtend SAN iSCSI initiator because the free GlobalSAN doesn’t work in 64-bit mode.


As a dedicated iSCSI box, the ReadyNAS Pro is fantastic for reads of all kinds. It has fantastic random access transfer speeds, and the transfer curve goes up from just over 13 MBytes/sec at 4KB to between 100-115 MBytes/sec at write sizes over 256 KB.

Writes show somewhat less consistent performance, although the tests that QuickBench run always dip down when 128KB writes are attempted. Once write sizes reach over 2MB, transfer speeds stabilize at between 80-90 MBytes/sec.



For reference, a 2TB Western Digital Caviar Green benchmarks at around 100 MB/s.

I thought it would also be interesting to compare maximum throughput with other drives and RAID setups I’ve tested in the past:


iSCSI can’t really keep up with my current disk subsystem, which consists of 4 striped 2TB Western Digital Caviar Black drives, but it is pretty impressive nonetheless, since the box lives in my closet (it’s silent, from my workspace) and can handle two drive failures (out of its six drives) without losing any data.

I also compared small block transfers:


For 4KB random reads, the iSCSI box is faster than everything except one of the SSDs. Of course, this does not take latency into account, which (I’m sure) makes a huge difference.

Practically, I only access most of the files stored on the iSCSI volume when Adobe Lightroom pulls down a RAW file. So far, there has been no noticeable difference in Lightroom performance when working with images stored on my local drive and images stored on the iSCSI volume. I will need more time to verify this claim, but everything is looking good so far!

| San Francisco, CA | link | trackback | Sep 8, 2010 20:19:59
  • http://www.facebook.com/corbosman Cor Bosman

    4k random reads are notoriously bad on some machines. It seems there is a bug in an intel chipset: http://shor.ter.net/Lm. At least my MBP has this problem, on both SSDs and HDDs. Dont know if mac pros have the same chipset.

    Would explain why the network drive is much faster.

  • http://echeng.com/ Eric Cheng

    Interesting, Cor. I should have noted that the Intel X25-M SSD benchmarks were done on my MacBook Pro, and all others, on my Mac Pro.

    Have you read about firmware updates / fixes for the problem?

  • Pingback: Around the web | alexking.org

  • Pingback: make money from home for free

  • Pingback: Deep Groove Ball Bearings

ARCHIVES
Journal Home
Where is Eric? (password)
Stuff for Sale
February 2014 (2)
December 2013 (1)
October 2013 (1)
June 2013 (3)
May 2013 (2)
April 2013 (3)
March 2013 (1)
February 2013 (2)
January 2013 (3)
November 2012 (2)
October 2012 (3)
September 2012 (8)
August 2012 (8)
July 2012 (8)
June 2012 (8)
May 2012 (5)
April 2012 (8)
March 2012 (15)
February 2012 (7)
January 2012 (6)
December 2011 (8)
November 2011 (10)
October 2011 (12)
September 2011 (8)
August 2011 (14)
July 2011 (9)
June 2011 (9)
May 2011 (11)
April 2011 (11)
March 2011 (12)
February 2011 (23)
January 2011 (22)
December 2010 (16)
November 2010 (17)
October 2010 (26)
September 2010 (24)
August 2010 (24)
July 2010 (30)
June 2010 (26)
May 2010 (21)
April 2010 (26)
March 2010 (19)
February 2010 (17)
January 2010 (29)
December 2009 (21)
November 2009 (23)
October 2009 (32)
September 2009 (19)
August 2009 (34)
July 2009 (21)
June 2009 (30)
May 2009 (23)
April 2009 (18)
March 2009 (6)
February 2009 (25)
January 2009 (5)
December 2008 (6)
November 2008 (22)
October 2008 (27)
September 2008 (25)
August 2008 (34)
July 2008 (34)
June 2008 (32)
May 2008 (26)
April 2008 (15)
March 2008 (19)
February 2008 (31)
January 2008 (43)
December 2007 (33)
November 2007 (29)
October 2007 (29)
September 2007 (9)
August 2007 (19)
July 2007 (10)
June 2007 (17)
May 2007 (26)
April 2007 (38)
March 2007 (39)
February 2007 (13)
January 2007 (35)
December 2006 (35)
November 2006 (14)
October 2006 (6)
September 2006 (20)
August 2006 (24)
July 2006 (32)
June 2006 (17)
May 2006 (23)
April 2006 (16)
March 2006 (16)
February 2006 (26)
January 2006 (33)
December 2005 (17)
November 2005 (21)
October 2005 (18)
September 2005 (17)
August 2005 (5)
July 2005 (15)
June 2005 (20)
May 2005 (25)
April 2005 (7)
March 2005 (22)
February 2005 (20)
January 2005 (38)
December 2004 (6)
November 2004 (24)
October 2004 (16)
September 2004 (22)
August 2004 (12)
July 2004 (17)
June 2004 (15)
May 2004 (11)
April 2004 (35)
March 2004 (40)
February 2004 (29)
January 2004 (36)
December 2003 (20)
November 2003 (18)
October 2003 (10)
September 2003 (18)
August 2003 (10)
July 2003 (34)
June 2003 (12)
May 2003 (49)
April 2003 (42)
March 2003 (42)
February 2003 (15)
January 2003 (7)
December 2002 (17)
November 2002 (19)
October 2002 (24)
September 2002 (22)
August 2002 (20)
July 2002 (21)
June 2002 (14)
May 2002 (15)
April 2002 (11)
March 2002 (13)
February 2002 (20)
January 2002 (17)
December 2001 (16)
Even Older Journal
Travel Journals

CATEGORIES / TAGS
(25) (2) (1) (3) (1) (1) (1) (6) (2) (3) (11) (8) (3) (1) (1) (4) (2) (4) (2) (1) (6) (1) (1) (1) (6) (2) (1) (1) (1) (3) (1) (5) (1) (1) (23) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (14) (1) (10) (1) (1) (2) (1) (1) (1) (27) (6) (3) (2) (4) (4) (1) (1) (41) (11) (12) (4) (38) (1) (3) (2) (4) (1) (1) (1) (1) (2) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (10) (25) (8) (3) (2) (3) (2) (1) (5) (1) (1) (2) (1) (1) (14) (1) (5) (1) (1) (5) (43) (1) (1) (1) (3) (24) (1) (1) (1) (1) (5) (1) (4) (1) (1) (10) (1) (3) (1) (1) (1) (1) (6) (5) (1) (1) (1) (3) (1) (3) (1) (1) (1) (69) (4) (3) (7) (3) (1) (16) (6) (1) (29) (1) (7) (1) (4) (4) (4) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (10) (4) (4) (2) (1) (89) (14) (1) (2) (79) (2) (2) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (3) (2) (3) (1) (1) (24) (3) (5) (4) (1) (2) (1)
MOST POPULAR
Most Popular Posts of All Time


Eric Cheng's RSS Journal Journal RSS
Eric Cheng's RSS Journal Comments RSS

proudly powered by wordpress
script exec time: 0.52s
i hate computers.