<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon G10 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://echeng.com/journal/2008/11/13/canon-g10-vs-panasonic-lumix-dmc-lx3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://echeng.com/journal/2008/11/13/canon-g10-vs-panasonic-lumix-dmc-lx3/</link>
	<description>Eric Cheng's Journal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:44:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: WKSOH</title>
		<link>http://echeng.com/journal/2008/11/13/canon-g10-vs-panasonic-lumix-dmc-lx3/comment-page-1/#comment-3164214</link>
		<dc:creator>WKSOH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 11:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://echeng.com/journal/?p=2415#comment-3164214</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Found a site comparing the G10 and LX3&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/peterlueck/sets/72157608358929292/show/with/2983787437/&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The G10 kicks serious ass in daylight... :)
IMG_xxxx are G10 pictures....&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Found a site comparing the G10 and LX3</p>

<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/peterlueck/sets/72157608358929292/show/with/2983787437/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/p.....983787437/</a></p>

<p>The G10 kicks serious ass in daylight&#8230; :)
IMG_xxxx are G10 pictures&#8230;.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthonyx2</title>
		<link>http://echeng.com/journal/2008/11/13/canon-g10-vs-panasonic-lumix-dmc-lx3/comment-page-1/#comment-3144395</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthonyx2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://echeng.com/journal/?p=2415#comment-3144395</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Now with the G-11 out, the noise advantage the LX3 had will probably be less or equal. (Not sure I like the swivel screen on the G-11... I wish it could be &quot;locked&quot; in place. Canon cut back on the pixels to get better low light results. Seems to have helped them go in a more helpful direction. I picked up an LX3 just the same, since I got a deal on it I couldn&#039;t pass up. I do like the solid aspect of the Canons though. Really tough call to pick one over the other.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now with the G-11 out, the noise advantage the LX3 had will probably be less or equal. (Not sure I like the swivel screen on the G-11&#8230; I wish it could be &#8220;locked&#8221; in place. Canon cut back on the pixels to get better low light results. Seems to have helped them go in a more helpful direction. I picked up an LX3 just the same, since I got a deal on it I couldn&#8217;t pass up. I do like the solid aspect of the Canons though. Really tough call to pick one over the other.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: riddly</title>
		<link>http://echeng.com/journal/2008/11/13/canon-g10-vs-panasonic-lumix-dmc-lx3/comment-page-1/#comment-3138217</link>
		<dc:creator>riddly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 01:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://echeng.com/journal/?p=2415#comment-3138217</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;d like to thank eveyone who posts about the lx3 and the g10......I am now completely confused, and might just stick with my old 5400 nikon- although it&#039;s still putting images away one pixel at a time when I&#039;m on my way home....oh and it cant see anything in low light...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to thank eveyone who posts about the lx3 and the g10&#8230;&#8230;I am now completely confused, and might just stick with my old 5400 nikon- although it&#8217;s still putting images away one pixel at a time when I&#8217;m on my way home&#8230;.oh and it cant see anything in low light&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://echeng.com/journal/2008/11/13/canon-g10-vs-panasonic-lumix-dmc-lx3/comment-page-1/#comment-3133331</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 00:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://echeng.com/journal/?p=2415#comment-3133331</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Luminous Landscape are nothing more than Canon fanboys.
The G10, good as it is, is just too heavy and bulky.
Better off comparing the LX3 with the S90...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Luminous Landscape are nothing more than Canon fanboys.
The G10, good as it is, is just too heavy and bulky.
Better off comparing the LX3 with the S90&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicole</title>
		<link>http://echeng.com/journal/2008/11/13/canon-g10-vs-panasonic-lumix-dmc-lx3/comment-page-1/#comment-3123944</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 16:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://echeng.com/journal/?p=2415#comment-3123944</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve been looking for a lx3 for some time but it seems to be sold out. Anyone know where I can get one?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been looking for a lx3 for some time but it seems to be sold out. Anyone know where I can get one?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bcheng</title>
		<link>http://echeng.com/journal/2008/11/13/canon-g10-vs-panasonic-lumix-dmc-lx3/comment-page-1/#comment-3110886</link>
		<dc:creator>bcheng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 06:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://echeng.com/journal/?p=2415#comment-3110886</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I purchased an LX3 about three weeks ago and I am loving using it. So small and easy to carry about. The final deciding factor for me was downloading some sample files from the web. There were side-by-side shots of the G10 and Lx3 of the same scene. The G10 shots were darker so I thought I&#039;d experiment with the unadulterated jpeg files that were posted. I was unable to bring any quality detail out the of the dark G10 photos to match the shadow detail of the LX3. Its not just low-light situation where the LX3 seemed to excell, but also capturing shadow detail in daylight shots - something very important much of the time -- in less that perfect world shooting conditions. That really sealed the deal for me and i&#039;m happy I bought the LX3.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I purchased an LX3 about three weeks ago and I am loving using it. So small and easy to carry about. The final deciding factor for me was downloading some sample files from the web. There were side-by-side shots of the G10 and Lx3 of the same scene. The G10 shots were darker so I thought I&#8217;d experiment with the unadulterated jpeg files that were posted. I was unable to bring any quality detail out the of the dark G10 photos to match the shadow detail of the LX3. Its not just low-light situation where the LX3 seemed to excell, but also capturing shadow detail in daylight shots &#8211; something very important much of the time &#8212; in less that perfect world shooting conditions. That really sealed the deal for me and i&#8217;m happy I bought the LX3.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://echeng.com/journal/2008/11/13/canon-g10-vs-panasonic-lumix-dmc-lx3/comment-page-1/#comment-3105166</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://echeng.com/journal/?p=2415#comment-3105166</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The LX3 high ISO noise performance seems to be only a very little better than the G10&#039;s... per pixel.  When you resize pictures from the two cameras to match, the G10 noise artefacts are much smaller and are less noticeable than the LX3&#039;s.  The only LX3 advantage I&#039;ve experienced is the fast lens enabling use of one stop lower ISO - not that this advantage should be under-rated, mind you!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The LX3 high ISO noise performance seems to be only a very little better than the G10&#8217;s&#8230; per pixel.  When you resize pictures from the two cameras to match, the G10 noise artefacts are much smaller and are less noticeable than the LX3&#8217;s.  The only LX3 advantage I&#8217;ve experienced is the fast lens enabling use of one stop lower ISO &#8211; not that this advantage should be under-rated, mind you!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KeithT</title>
		<link>http://echeng.com/journal/2008/11/13/canon-g10-vs-panasonic-lumix-dmc-lx3/comment-page-1/#comment-3100223</link>
		<dc:creator>KeithT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://echeng.com/journal/?p=2415#comment-3100223</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;All very well, but the LX3 kicks ass with the G10 on noise in low light situations.  As a compliment to a DSLR outfit, the size and weight of the LX3 easily wins over the Canon G10 hands down.  I would comfortably take the LX3 along with or without my 5d gear,  I wouldn&#039;t want to do that with the G10 - and I can get it via staff sales if I wanted to get it I hasten to add.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All very well, but the LX3 kicks ass with the G10 on noise in low light situations.  As a compliment to a DSLR outfit, the size and weight of the LX3 easily wins over the Canon G10 hands down.  I would comfortably take the LX3 along with or without my 5d gear,  I wouldn&#8217;t want to do that with the G10 &#8211; and I can get it via staff sales if I wanted to get it I hasten to add.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bcheng</title>
		<link>http://echeng.com/journal/2008/11/13/canon-g10-vs-panasonic-lumix-dmc-lx3/comment-page-1/#comment-3092469</link>
		<dc:creator>bcheng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 07:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://echeng.com/journal/?p=2415#comment-3092469</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Oh, here is the Web site with the measurements of the G10s and LX3 relative dynamic range. I hope it helps someone&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/eng/Image-Quality-Database/Compare-cameras/(appareil1)/240&#124;0/(appareil2)/247&#124;0/(onglet)/0/(brand)/Panasonic/(brand2)/Canon&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, here is the Web site with the measurements of the G10s and LX3 relative dynamic range. I hope it helps someone</p>

<p><a href="http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/eng/Image-Quality-Database/Compare-cameras/(appareil1)/240" rel="nofollow">http://www.dxomark.com/index.p.....reil1)/240</a>|0/(appareil2)/247|0/(onglet)/0/(brand)/Panasonic/(brand2)/Canon</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://echeng.com/journal/2008/11/13/canon-g10-vs-panasonic-lumix-dmc-lx3/comment-page-1/#comment-3092421</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 06:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://echeng.com/journal/?p=2415#comment-3092421</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;So after several months of use, any further comments on these two serious compact cameras? I&#039;m in the market for a compact camera now and I&#039;ve done extensive research on both these cameras. I&#039;m currently using a 450D as my main, but switching to a 50D dSLR by the end of the month and will need something more pocketable to compliment my photography gear =D&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I have to say, most reviews I&#039;ve read appears to have the LX3 on top with its 24mm wide and f/2 fast lens. Just held the G10 today and it feels really good, the layout for the manual settings is pretty nice and its a nice solid build with a slight nostalgic feeling of the rangefinder cameras. I guess I would still settle for the LX3 though, after using fast primes on my SLR, you can really learn to appreciate fast lens and bokeh =D&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Keep on the lookout for the new Olympus m4/3 compact camera with SLR equivalent sensors being announced later this month though, could be pretty interesting. Olympus E-P1...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So after several months of use, any further comments on these two serious compact cameras? I&#8217;m in the market for a compact camera now and I&#8217;ve done extensive research on both these cameras. I&#8217;m currently using a 450D as my main, but switching to a 50D dSLR by the end of the month and will need something more pocketable to compliment my photography gear =D</p>

<p>I have to say, most reviews I&#8217;ve read appears to have the LX3 on top with its 24mm wide and f/2 fast lens. Just held the G10 today and it feels really good, the layout for the manual settings is pretty nice and its a nice solid build with a slight nostalgic feeling of the rangefinder cameras. I guess I would still settle for the LX3 though, after using fast primes on my SLR, you can really learn to appreciate fast lens and bokeh =D</p>

<p>Keep on the lookout for the new Olympus m4/3 compact camera with SLR equivalent sensors being announced later this month though, could be pretty interesting. Olympus E-P1&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

