ENTRIES
Welcome to Eric Cheng's online journal! You are not logged in. [ Log in ]
« Thoughts on iPhone 2.0 firmware :: index :: Getting organized again with mind maps »

Number of men who will die in 2008

:: Thursday, July 17th, 2008 @ 5:57:21 pm

:: Tags: ,

This image has been sent to me so many times that I thought I’d finally post it (presumably sent to me because it includes a “shark attack” item). I’m told that there are an average of five reported fatalities by shark attack each year, worldwide. This year, I believe there have been four high-profile, shark-related deaths so far. We’re ahead of schedule, it seems.

People throw around stats all the time, like “you’re more likely to be killed by XXX than by a shark.” I have to say that I’m occasionally guilty of this, but I try to make informed comparisons. Most often, I cringe when someone throws out a comparison like this because most statistics quoted by shark lovers do not take into account the number of people who are exposed to the agent of death. For example, falling coconuts kill more people than do sharks, as do vending machines. But the number of people exposed to coconut trees and vending machines probably far outnumber those exposed to sharks. I’m more interested in relative risk.

The Florida Museum of Natural History hosts the International Shark Attack File, which has interesting, fact-based write-ups of sharks attacks worldwide. Some of them take into account exposure risk, but most of them use absolute numbers in their statistics. Here are a few good pages to start with:

  1. The Relative Risk of Shark Attacks to Humans
  2. Summary of shark attacks in 2003
  3. Statistics of beach injuries and fatalities in the USA in 2000

I’ve pulled out some interesting statistics:

Coastal States, USA: 1959-2007 Avg Number of Lightning Fatalities per year: 39.7* Avg Number of Shark Attacks: 18.4 Avg Number of Shark Fatalities: 0.5

The lightning study doesn’t include any non-coastal states, but it still includes a lot of people who do not have any exposure to sharks. It’s a start.

Here’s a study of sharks vs. other animals:

Average Number of Fatalities Per Year by Animal, USA Deer (Vehicular Collisions) 130 Dogs 18 Snakes 15 Mountain Lions 0.6 Sharks 0.4

Just as many people are never exposed to sharks, many people are never exposed to mountain lions. It’s an imperfect study, but it still shows that you should probably be more afraid of most other animals.

Year 2000 USA Beach Injuries and Fatalities Drowning and other beach-related fatalites 1 in 2 million Drowning fatalites 1 in 3.5 million Shark attacks 1 in 11.5 million Shark attack fatalites 0 in 264.1 million

This one is better because it takes into account the number of people who actually go to the beach. Presumably, those people are the same ones who have a chance of being nailed by a shark. Not everyone goes into the water (and therefore, are not exposed to sharks), but at the same time, divers and people on boats (who are exposed to sharks) are probably not accounted for either.

Finally, be sure to watch out for sand holes. I hear they’re really vicious.

| Popularity: 1% | Sausalito, CA | link | trackback | | Jul 17, 2008 17:57:21

:: 2 comments (rss)

  1. posted by dave on Mon, July 21, 2008 @ 1:36 pm

    I like the stats, but the graphic is a failure as its just a mosaic of numbers and doesn’t represent scale graphicaly. And thank you for being more than bright enough to mention how relative risk is the only way to compare stats. I’m so tired of people reporting risk without taking into account exposure–measures of risk are irrelevant without it. (These are the same people who confuse correlation and causation.)

  2. posted by Johnny Naked on Mon, July 21, 2008 @ 3:45 pm

    Just in case anyone who reads your blog is concerned as to what to do SHOULD they encounter a mountain lion, here’s a YouTube link to a short video explaining the proper etiquette for just such a situation. (I’m not sure if it applies to sharks, though.)

    :)

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-I4YXveVtWs

    P.S. My response, however, would be to scream… and then promptly be eaten.

:: leave a reply

Use: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

RECENT MICROBLOG ACTIVITY

Posting tweet...

ARCHIVES
Journal Home
Where is Eric? (password)
Stuff for Sale
September 2008 (4)
August 2008 (34)
July 2008 (34)
June 2008 (32)
May 2008 (26)
April 2008 (15)
March 2008 (19)
February 2008 (31)
January 2008 (43)
December 2007 (33)
November 2007 (29)
October 2007 (29)
September 2007 (9)
August 2007 (19)
July 2007 (10)
June 2007 (17)
May 2007 (26)
April 2007 (38)
March 2007 (39)
February 2007 (13)
January 2007 (35)
December 2006 (35)
November 2006 (14)
October 2006 (6)
September 2006 (20)
August 2006 (24)
July 2006 (32)
June 2006 (17)
May 2006 (23)
April 2006 (16)
March 2006 (16)
February 2006 (26)
January 2006 (34)
December 2005 (17)
November 2005 (21)
October 2005 (18)
September 2005 (17)
August 2005 (5)
July 2005 (15)
June 2005 (20)
May 2005 (25)
April 2005 (7)
March 2005 (22)
February 2005 (20)
January 2005 (38)
December 2004 (6)
November 2004 (24)
October 2004 (16)
September 2004 (22)
August 2004 (12)
July 2004 (17)
June 2004 (15)
May 2004 (11)
April 2004 (35)
March 2004 (40)
February 2004 (29)
January 2004 (36)
December 2003 (20)
November 2003 (18)
October 2003 (10)
September 2003 (18)
August 2003 (10)
July 2003 (34)
June 2003 (12)
May 2003 (49)
April 2003 (42)
March 2003 (42)
February 2003 (15)
January 2003 (7)
December 2002 (17)
November 2002 (19)
October 2002 (24)
September 2002 (22)
August 2002 (20)
July 2002 (21)
June 2002 (14)
May 2002 (15)
April 2002 (11)
March 2002 (13)
February 2002 (20)
January 2002 (17)
December 2001 (16)
Even Older Journal
Travel Journals

VIENNA TENG
Support my friend and favorite singer-songwriter, Vienna Teng!

--- Next Show ---

Schedule coming soon.
[ discography ]

Eric Cheng's RSS Journal Journal RSS
Eric Cheng's RSS Journal Comments RSS

Rice Bowl Journals

proudly powered by wordpress
script exec time: 0.59s
i hate computers.