<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An attempt at using Opera</title>
	<atom:link href="http://echeng.com/journal/2007/11/06/an-attempt-at-using-opera/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://echeng.com/journal/2007/11/06/an-attempt-at-using-opera/</link>
	<description>Eric Cheng's Journal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:44:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kerim Friedman</title>
		<link>http://echeng.com/journal/2007/11/06/an-attempt-at-using-opera/comment-page-1/#comment-686083</link>
		<dc:creator>Kerim Friedman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 01:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://echeng.com/journal/2007/11/06/an-attempt-at-using-opera/#comment-686083</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Although I rely on too many Firefox extensions to switch, the GreaseKit plugin for Safari does allow you to implement many Greasemonkey scripts on Safari, which greatly expands your options. It would be great to see browsers support a common standard for Javascript site plugins. I know Gmail is now offering an API of sorts for greasemonkey script developers. (Gmail 2.0 is still better on Firefox than Safari.)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I rely on too many Firefox extensions to switch, the GreaseKit plugin for Safari does allow you to implement many Greasemonkey scripts on Safari, which greatly expands your options. It would be great to see browsers support a common standard for Javascript site plugins. I know Gmail is now offering an API of sorts for greasemonkey script developers. (Gmail 2.0 is still better on Firefox than Safari.)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Around the web &#124; alexking.org</title>
		<link>http://echeng.com/journal/2007/11/06/an-attempt-at-using-opera/comment-page-1/#comment-685984</link>
		<dc:creator>Around the web &#124; alexking.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 23:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://echeng.com/journal/2007/11/06/an-attempt-at-using-opera/#comment-685984</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] An attempt at using Opera [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] An attempt at using Opera [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Laity</title>
		<link>http://echeng.com/journal/2007/11/06/an-attempt-at-using-opera/comment-page-1/#comment-665314</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Laity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 17:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://echeng.com/journal/2007/11/06/an-attempt-at-using-opera/#comment-665314</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I like Safari 3, they fixed a bunch of long-standing bugs.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Safari 3, they fixed a bunch of long-standing bugs.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://echeng.com/journal/2007/11/06/an-attempt-at-using-opera/comment-page-1/#comment-665060</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 15:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://echeng.com/journal/2007/11/06/an-attempt-at-using-opera/#comment-665060</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;When you upgrade to Leopard, you get Safari 3 as part of the deal. From what we&#039;ve seen in development testing, Safari 2 to Safari 3 is almost as big a change as from IE6 to IE7.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I want to try Safari 3 as my primary browser, but need someone to port the PwdHash extension (Firefox and IE) to it first.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you upgrade to Leopard, you get Safari 3 as part of the deal. From what we&#8217;ve seen in development testing, Safari 2 to Safari 3 is almost as big a change as from IE6 to IE7.</p>

<p>I want to try Safari 3 as my primary browser, but need someone to port the PwdHash extension (Firefox and IE) to it first.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

