<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spam filter augmentation proposal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://echeng.com/journal/2007/04/27/spam-filter-augmentation-proposal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://echeng.com/journal/2007/04/27/spam-filter-augmentation-proposal/</link>
	<description>Eric Cheng's Journal</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 09:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: tanthalas</title>
		<link>http://echeng.com/journal/2007/04/27/spam-filter-augmentation-proposal/#comment-396850</link>
		<dc:creator>tanthalas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 20:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://echeng.com/journal/2007/04/27/spam-filter-augmentation-proposal/#comment-396850</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;carrot on a stick? +3% mount speed?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;oh man I just said too much. :(&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;good thing you don't filter on proper capitalization. :)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>carrot on a stick? +3% mount speed?</p>

<p>oh man I just said too much. :(</p>

<p>good thing you don&#8217;t filter on proper capitalization. :)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tony</title>
		<link>http://echeng.com/journal/2007/04/27/spam-filter-augmentation-proposal/#comment-396618</link>
		<dc:creator>tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 14:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://echeng.com/journal/2007/04/27/spam-filter-augmentation-proposal/#comment-396618</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;ROFLCOPTERS, lmao u r teh suck, Eric.  learn2communicate!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Heh, sorry, had to get it out of my system.  As a recovering World of Warcraft addict, and having trolled the WoW forums way too much, I think my brain is permanently scarred by how much written communication has degenerated on the interweb.  I support your intentions (if not your stick &#62; carrot approach - but then again, I'm a pinko liberal).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ROFLCOPTERS, lmao u r teh suck, Eric.  learn2communicate!</p>

<p>Heh, sorry, had to get it out of my system.  As a recovering World of Warcraft addict, and having trolled the WoW forums way too much, I think my brain is permanently scarred by how much written communication has degenerated on the interweb.  I support your intentions (if not your stick &gt; carrot approach - but then again, I&#8217;m a pinko liberal).</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: george</title>
		<link>http://echeng.com/journal/2007/04/27/spam-filter-augmentation-proposal/#comment-396569</link>
		<dc:creator>george</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 10:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://echeng.com/journal/2007/04/27/spam-filter-augmentation-proposal/#comment-396569</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;How do it know if the sentence is a question.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do it know if the sentence is a question.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: echeng</title>
		<link>http://echeng.com/journal/2007/04/27/spam-filter-augmentation-proposal/#comment-396151</link>
		<dc:creator>echeng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 15:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://echeng.com/journal/2007/04/27/spam-filter-augmentation-proposal/#comment-396151</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;hey, al. i know you do. :)  but does "optimal" take into account the impression you give to your recipient?  if you save 1 second while typing, but cause your recipient to cringe, is it worth it?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;it's like talking too fast -- one's mouth finishes moving earlier, but it doesn't mean that the message is delivered more efficiently.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey, al. i know you do. :)  but does &#8220;optimal&#8221; take into account the impression you give to your recipient?  if you save 1 second while typing, but cause your recipient to cringe, is it worth it?</p>

<p>it&#8217;s like talking too fast &#8212; one&#8217;s mouth finishes moving earlier, but it doesn&#8217;t mean that the message is delivered more efficiently.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: al vinjamur</title>
		<link>http://echeng.com/journal/2007/04/27/spam-filter-augmentation-proposal/#comment-396095</link>
		<dc:creator>al vinjamur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 13:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://echeng.com/journal/2007/04/27/spam-filter-augmentation-proposal/#comment-396095</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;i do all of the things u listed. i call it "oplish" (optimal english)
but i never "lol" or "lmao" and prefer the :-) instead.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i do all of the things u listed. i call it &#8220;oplish&#8221; (optimal english)
but i never &#8220;lol&#8221; or &#8220;lmao&#8221; and prefer the :-) instead.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: syndromes</title>
		<link>http://echeng.com/journal/2007/04/27/spam-filter-augmentation-proposal/#comment-395700</link>
		<dc:creator>syndromes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 22:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://echeng.com/journal/2007/04/27/spam-filter-augmentation-proposal/#comment-395700</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I LUV UR SITE LOL ????????????????????????????????????????.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I LUV UR SITE LOL ????????????????????????????????????????.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
