<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wireless sucks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://echeng.com/journal/2006/01/05/wireless-sucks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://echeng.com/journal/2006/01/05/wireless-sucks/</link>
	<description>Eric Cheng's Journal</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 06:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://echeng.com/journal/2006/01/05/wireless-sucks/#comment-4823</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2006 20:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1091#comment-4823</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Agreed.  Wireless seems like another one of those great tech innovations that's just not ready for primetime.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My (complimentarly) macro rant on technology marketing:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because of the pressure to stay ahead of the competition, innovate, launch new products, grow revenue, etc., tech companies launch products that don't work very well on a regular basis.  Since there's a large enough early adopter (geek) audience willing to consistently take a risk on new products, the threshold for quality at launch is low.  If the early adopters suddenly required a higher standard of product performance (across the board) and this easy market dried up, companies would be forced to only introduce products when they &lt;em&gt;really&lt;/em&gt; work reliably in order to be sucessful in the marketplace.  Since this won't happen, we're destined to suffer through generations 1 through X before a version that &lt;em&gt;really&lt;/em&gt; works is launched.  This is why I'm no longer a gadget geek--I'm tired of paying a premium to be an alpha tester for stuff that generally disapoints.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed.  Wireless seems like another one of those great tech innovations that&#8217;s just not ready for primetime.  <br />
<br />
My (complimentarly) macro rant on technology marketing:<br />
<br />
Because of the pressure to stay ahead of the competition, innovate, launch new products, grow revenue, etc., tech companies launch products that don&#8217;t work very well on a regular basis.  Since there&#8217;s a large enough early adopter (geek) audience willing to consistently take a risk on new products, the threshold for quality at launch is low.  If the early adopters suddenly required a higher standard of product performance (across the board) and this easy market dried up, companies would be forced to only introduce products when they <em>really</em> work reliably in order to be sucessful in the marketplace.  Since this won&#8217;t happen, we&#8217;re destined to suffer through generations 1 through X before a version that <em>really</em> works is launched.  This is why I&#8217;m no longer a gadget geek&#8211;I&#8217;m tired of paying a premium to be an alpha tester for stuff that generally disapoints.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: enjelani</title>
		<link>http://echeng.com/journal/2006/01/05/wireless-sucks/#comment-4821</link>
		<dc:creator>enjelani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2006 02:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1091#comment-4821</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;this isn't exactly on-topic, but i just craigslisted a bunch of software that i bought in 1997-2000.  some of it for "Mac OS 7.1 or higher."  and i've been inundated with responses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
it's funny to realize that there are actually a good number of people who are  content to live 5-7 years behind the technology curve.  sort of reminds me of when i'd procrastinate on problem sets in school, just in case the diligent early-birds caught errors in the assignment itself.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this isn&#8217;t exactly on-topic, but i just craigslisted a bunch of software that i bought in 1997-2000.  some of it for &#8220;Mac OS 7.1 or higher.&#8221;  and i&#8217;ve been inundated with responses.<br />
<br />
it&#8217;s funny to realize that there are actually a good number of people who are  content to live 5-7 years behind the technology curve.  sort of reminds me of when i&#8217;d procrastinate on problem sets in school, just in case the diligent early-birds caught errors in the assignment itself.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
