<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RAW Converters, etc.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://echeng.com/journal/2004/05/28/raw-converters-etc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://echeng.com/journal/2004/05/28/raw-converters-etc/</link>
	<description>Eric Cheng's Journal</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: vinh</title>
		<link>http://echeng.com/journal/2004/05/28/raw-converters-etc/#comment-3142</link>
		<dc:creator>vinh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2004 18:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=702#comment-3142</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Eric, I noticed that COBA, the UG that Adam Tow is involved with is having a meeting this Wednesday and will be discussing RAW conversion software.  would this have anything to do with your article?  e.g. are you also involved in COBA and will be presenting?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric, I noticed that COBA, the UG that Adam Tow is involved with is having a meeting this Wednesday and will be discussing RAW conversion software.  would this have anything to do with your article?  e.g. are you also involved in COBA and will be presenting?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: echeng</title>
		<link>http://echeng.com/journal/2004/05/28/raw-converters-etc/#comment-3113</link>
		<dc:creator>echeng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2004 00:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=702#comment-3113</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;unless you are converting underwater photos, you are unlikely to see that sort of behavior.  i prefer C1 to the others most of the time, but underwater, they're more evenly matched. :)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>unless you are converting underwater photos, you are unlikely to see that sort of behavior.  i prefer C1 to the others most of the time, but underwater, they&#8217;re more evenly matched. :)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Khanh</title>
		<link>http://echeng.com/journal/2004/05/28/raw-converters-etc/#comment-3112</link>
		<dc:creator>Khanh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2004 23:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=702#comment-3112</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;hmmm.. Interesting find Eric.  I, myself, have not yet seen this behavior on C1LE's conversion...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'll have to check the next time I see the situation you have described in your article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I know that for myself....C1LE offers a much better and quicker workflow to the conversion versus the packaged Canon software.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was really turned off by the lack of real-time viewing of changes in the Canon FVU.  Everytime I made a change to the conversion properties...it would take a bit to load before viewing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I havent tried CS yet, but I hear the workflow is comparable to C1's.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmmm.. Interesting find Eric.  I, myself, have not yet seen this behavior on C1LE&#8217;s conversion&#8230;<br />
<br />
I&#8217;ll have to check the next time I see the situation you have described in your article.<br />
<br />
I know that for myself&#8230;.C1LE offers a much better and quicker workflow to the conversion versus the packaged Canon software.<br />
<br />
I was really turned off by the lack of real-time viewing of changes in the Canon FVU.  Everytime I made a change to the conversion properties&#8230;it would take a bit to load before viewing.<br />
<br />
I havent tried CS yet, but I hear the workflow is comparable to C1&#8217;s.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
